Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Gurgen Margaryan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I added a section about the Azeri response to the murder of Markaryan. I felt that it was important to note that Safarov's actions do not appear to be widely condemned by the Azerbaijani government, but are rather promoted as an example to follow. If there are any significant opinions in Azerbaijan to the contrary, please add them to this section. Augustgrahl—Preceding undated comment added at 17:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baku87 what do you call the IWPR? VartanM (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Seems like political motivations why there is an issue this should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.109.96.114 (talk) 10:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

marked for deletion - why?

[edit]

I find it very strange that this page was marked for deletion now, shortly after the scandal broke out. It is here for 6 years already. Kozka (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All in favor of keeping this this article?
Aye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khimaris (talkcontribs) 18:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
just little turkish low freedom index paid propaganda things 24.24.213.180 (talk) 03:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

budapest.info

[edit]

Can someone tell me what's wrong with budapest.info? It is the only website available that gives near complete coverage of the murder. So what if it is Armenian, you can't discriminate against sources based on their origin. If you have any other concerns about it, I'm open to hearing you. George Spurlin (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not slander! My comment here. You know it. You can not forgotten that. --Esc2003 (talk) 09:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Who and when did I slander? Do you have another website that gives this much information about the subject? George Spurlin (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You says: the only reason that was given was because it was Armenian If no verifiable information in this website, more much information, who cares? --Esc2003 (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since day one you have been attacking the site because it was Armenian, that's not slander, that's stating the facts. If you can't provide alternatives, why are you attacking the only available one? George Spurlin (talk) 11:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My justification is obvious. Armenian or Azerbaijani does not matter to me. You can not close that subject to citing the excuse of discrimination or racism. I'm sorry, but attacker person is only you. Everyone understand my rationale (although my bad English). --Esc2003 (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But you have numerous times pointed out that it was pro-Armenian. Please, if you can state what is wrong with the site, so we can discuss it. I'm sorry if you feel that I attacked you, I have no interest of attacking anyone. George Spurlin (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

* -Esc2003 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was no consensus. Last comment made over half a year ago, so time to close. Iselilja (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon

[edit]

hongari pls — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.104.0.221 (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

Currently both articles Gurgen Margaryan and Ramil Safarov are essentially about the murder case and related developments, such as international reactions. This leads to a duplication of effort. It is also contrary to WP:1E, which says: "When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both. ... The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person." For these reasons, I propose merging both articles into a single one about the murder case,Murder of Gurgen Margaryan. That article would have subsections for the biographies of both men.  Sandstein  08:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - Ramil Safarov is known for at least two events: the murder he committed in 2004 and his controversial extradition and pardon in 2012. The second event received probably even more publicity in the world than the first one. So it's clearly not the case of a single event (WP:1E). --Daniel (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Gurgen Margaryan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 September 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus exists that almost all coverage about Margaryan is about his murder, not about he himself. A merge with the Safarov article can be discussed separately. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Gurgen MargaryanMurder of Gurgen Margaryan – The guy is only notable for being murdered, so WP:BIO1E/WP:VICTIM applies. There is also a lot of content in the Ramil Safarov article that belongs in the event article. (t · c) buidhe 11:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Wouldn't it make more sense to create a single article that synthesizes both angles on the event, then? Both Margaryan and Safarov appear to be notable only for this incident, so WP:CRIME and WP:EVENT would both suggest that a single, event-focused article would be the most appropriate way to handle this case. ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly what I was thinking, according to WP:VICTIM a crime victim should only have a stand alone article if there is historical significance, "indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role." For example, there are many sources covering George Floyd's life prior and during the incidents that lead to his death, sufficiently to justify a separate article. But none of the sources I've examined about this murder focus on Margaryan's role, all he did was be the wrong nationality at the wrong place/time. (t · c) buidhe 01:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that the majority of detail regarding the murder and its aftermath is in the Ramil Safarov article which has 63,500 bytes and 102 inline cites. The Gurgen Margaryan article, on the other hand, has 15,379 bytes and 20 inline cites, seven of which are also in the Ramil Safarov article, while the remaining 13, which are specific to Margaryan's life and family, are not among the cites listed at Safarov.
Also, the three entries under Margaryan's "External links" — 1) Media related to Gurgen Margaryan at Wikimedia Commons 2) Budapest Case - on the murder of Lt. Gurgen Margaryan: Safarov's testimony, eye-witness accounts, Armenian and Azerbaijani Responses and 3) ArmeniaNow.com Murder of officer at NATO peace program provokes outrage — are not listed under Safarov, which has different "External links".
Thus, it would seem more intuitive to propose Ramil SafarovMurder of Gurgen Margaryan and then merge the biographical details as well the 13 inline cites and the three "External links" unique to Margaryan into the newly-renamed Murder of Gurgen Margaryan article, in the event there is consensus for the Ramil SafarovMurder of Gurgen Margaryan renaming. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 15:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Unfortunately, yes, Gurgen is only notable for his horrible death. And I trust Buidhe's suggestion, she's one of the most prolific editors in AA area and far beyond, especially in genocides/massacres articles. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.