Talk:Move Like This

Move Like This has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 26, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 13, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite telling a reporter in 1997 that he would "never" reunite with The Cars, singer Ric Ocasek relented in 2010 to record Move Like This, the band's first studio album in 23 years?

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Move Like This/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mattg82 (talk · contribs) 02:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

1b) The lead is rather short, it should be expanded. The iTunes edition track listing should ideally be in the same track listing format as the Best Buy edition.

2b) Minor issue: ref 17 has not details, publisher, accessdate etc

3a/b) A few things a missing from this article. It could do with a chart table. Release history? was the album released in other countries? Any additional personnel, producers, engineers etc? Maybe include a bit more about the tour? Include a music sample perhaps?

This is a small and tidy article, a refreshing change from articles on pop culture albums, which are behemoths and never hold my attention. Holding until these quibbles are fixed and the article filled out a bit more. Mattg82 (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matt. Thanks for the feedback so far; I will have some time this weekend to work on the issues you brought up, so stay tuned! Thanks again, 28bytes (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes so far:

Audio sample added
iTunes tracklist formatting made consistent with other tracklists
Ref 17 filled out
Tour section expanded
Production & engineering information added

I'll tackle the rest tomorrow. 28bytes (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the lead a bit and added a chart section. There doesn't appear to be anything to add regarding the release date(s): it was released worldwide in CD and digital download formats on May 10, 2011, and I can't find any sources that discuss any other release dates. I think that addresses your comments; please let me know if I have missed anything. 28bytes (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK looking good. One final nick-pick, I would remove the section headers from Album and Singles, then replace it with a semi-colon. ===Albums=== to ;Albums ===Singles=== to ;Singles This will still make them bold headers but it will remove the out of place edit tag.

I will leave this open for a few more days before passing to see if any opinions from other editors appear, cheers. Mattg82 (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A good suggestion; done. 28bytes (talk) 00:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing article, nice work. Mattg82 (talk) 22:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 28bytes (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]