Talk:Moro Rock
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge with Sequoia National Park?
[edit]User:Reywas92 merged this article into the National Park article. I've reverted, pending discussion.
Looking at WP:MERGE, I think that this article should be preserved as independent, because:
- This article could be expanded into a longer standalone article, cross-linked to the NP article
- Moro Rock is a discrete subject and deserve its own article, even though it is short
Comments? Thoughts? —hike395 (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome to expand it, but it is part of the National Park and is not a fully discrete subject. All relevant information is included in this main article, so an independent article would be redundant. Reywas92Talk 18:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not all relevant information was in the article: the infobox info and photos were lost. I also expanded the article with geology and recreation. Note that we have many articles about mountains in National Parks: Little Tahoma, Mount Dana, University Peak, etc. The precedent is that mountains deserve separate articles. —hike395 (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- C-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance