Talk:Monobloc (chair)

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Podcast

Here is a podcast about the monobloc, including info on who made the first one: https://gimletmedia.com/episode/chair-misunderstood 2A02:8108:85C0:2AFC:3560:D8AB:E474:8EC5 (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Variations

Most of the one-piece plastic chairs in the world look much like the Grossfillex chair released in 1983. The chair designed by D.C. Simpson in 1946 did not have the slats cut into it that allow the chair to drain water when left outside. I think the article at the moment gives the impression that all monobloc chairs look like the Grossfilex chair. To me any chair that is made from one piece of plastic is a monobloc chair, but I think perhaps in common usage the term has come to refer to the outdoor garden chair with slats for draining water. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.0.178 (talk) 21:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Stamps of Paraguay, 2015-01.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this article should be protected

The routine vandalism of this article, while occasionally humorous, is very usually non-conducive to a good Wikipedia article, so I think that this article should be protected.

Caucasianhamburger (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think a page needs protection applied, the place to request that is Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. But the last vandalism edit to this article was four months ago, I don't see that there are any grounds for applying protection to it. Belbury (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]