This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Actually what is worse, is that your claim that it is highly POV is in fact the epitome of POV!
This article is poorly written, not very comprehensive and doesn't cite sources in an appropriate manner, not enough evidence to support claims.
There was a recent emendation made to this article, particular the phrase "cold, calculating." An individual deleted this phrase because he or she believed that it implied ill-moral behavior or conduct. On the contrary, the phrase "cold, calculating" implies amoral conduct, that is whether a behavior is valued bad or good is beside the point or is irrelevant. Decision-making that is cold, and calculating that is void of moral considerations is tantamount to rational choice theory or cost-benefit decision making. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowboxers (talk • contribs) 19:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]