Talk:Molecular gastronomy

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Food and drink High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Really scientific?

The article seems very suspect to me, with lots of unclear and suspicious claims. Using sugar substitutes is somehow "molecular gastronomy" or a "scientific" approach to cooking?

I think this article should be evaluated and revised by somebody who really understands what the "science" part in molecular gastronomy is. 2001:708:20:140B:0:0:0:19AB (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it is mostly people getting a kick out of the idea of using tools and ingredients that were mostly only available to commercial food production (or too bothersome for any normal home cook to bother with) and thinking that they are doing something new. It's more "the thought that counts." — al-Shimoni (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]