Talk:Mission (grape)

Mission (grape) was nominated as a Agriculture, food and drink good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 7, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Food and drink: Wine Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of Wines task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Wine open tasks:

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Wine:

Article request: Sebastiani family, Great Wine Capitals of the World.

Expand: any of the ~700 wine stubs, particularly the region and "miscellaneous" ones, Western Australian wine

Improve: Canadian wine, Greek wine, Vitis vinifera, wine serving temperature, Western Australian wine, other Start class articles

Articles to GA: Wine, Australian wine, Bordeaux wine, Burgundy wine, California wine, Champagne (wine), Chianti, Dessert wine, French wine, German wine, Grenache, Italian wine, Merlot, Pinot gris, Pinot noir, Rioja (wine), Spanish wine, Sparkling wine, Syrah, Tempranillo, Winemaking

Articles to FA: Cabernet Sauvignon, Riesling, Sauvignon blanc

Cleanup: Cleanup lists of wine-related articles: all articles and articles by category.

Unreferenced biographies of living persons

Copyedit: Aligoté, Cabernet franc, Malbec, Robert M. Parker, Jr., Pinot blanc, Rioja (wine)

Photo request: Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be licensed for Wikipedia.

Collaboration: Operation stub-killer, Nominations for top level importance

Infobox: Template:Infobox grape variety, Template:Infobox winery

Other: Comment on the grape article template and on the grape infobox. Add to the Wikiquote page for wine: Wikiquote wine

view • edit • discuss • history • watch

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mission (grape)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dishita Bhowmik (talk · contribs) 09:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article is ready enough to qualify as a good article. It predominantly contains historical information and is not wide in its coverage. It needs recent information such as production, farmed in areas, etc. It also contains some copyrighted information. Eligible for quick fail. DishitaBhowmik 09:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First let me say thanks for beginning this GAN. That said, what copyright violations were found? I have used Duplication Detector and did not find any significant issues. This historical information is all sourced to reliable sources. The information added since April 2019, contains a significant amount of what can be found via internet searches. Thus, quickly failing does nothing to actually improve the article content.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 20:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, Earwig finds that copyright violation is unlikely.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 21:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RightCowLeftCoast: I agree that quick fail does nothing to improve the article. However, instructions clarify that if an article is not yet ready for GA status, it can be quick failed. I already appreciate your contributions to the article and am ready to work on it with you but I am currently busy for a few days. When I am free again, I will try to find out more information on the subject. Once the article is ready after the work, you can renominate it and inform me on my talk page so that I can pass it quickly. Regards DishitaBhowmik 08:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is primarily historical information, as it is no longer widely produced, only produced by niche growers. As such information about current growing patterns of this varietal other than the statement written in the Los Angeles Times is sparse. If you know more than what the internet has readily available, than by all means add to it!--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 01:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RightCowLeftCoast: I have found these links.

I think we could use some information from there. DishitaBhowmik 16:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All but the Specialty Produce are included in the article (and I have seen it for my search for additional reliable sources). Specialty Produce is a commerce site, and thus is not a preferred type of source. That said, while I understand that there is good intention in offering these sources, that some of these sources are already in the article (wine-searcher is in the external links section, and the 2019 LA Times article is already utilized in the article four separate times), means that the GAR of quick fail shows that the reviewer failed to actually look at the article. Take care, be well, and be safe in these troubling times.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 01:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the much needed wishes especially when China is our neighbour. And same to you. However I am a newbie to GAN review so I am often confused in my assesment, but I hope to improve my understanding of the review process. Thanks for patiently helping me improve my mistakes. That said I am beginning to think that maybe I should have put the review on hold. Can I do that now? I am willing to rectify my mistake. DishitaBhowmik 14:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review has been quick failed, and closed. What has been done has been done. Now to go forward and continue article improvement.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]