Talk:Miss Calypso

Miss Calypso has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 10, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Miss Calypso appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Miss Calypso, a 1957 album by future poet and writer Maya Angelou, was reissued in 1995, probably as part of the "exotica-space age pop revival"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miss Calypso.

Wikipedia

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Cut and pasted from userspace; bringing it over here because draft will soon be deleted:

Sources from album downloaded to Google docs by User:Binksternet: Miss Calypso track list, 1957 album liner notes by Hal Spector, and1995 CD liner notes by Chuck Foster, including a bit of commentary on the 1957 liner notes. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the links one at a time, then right-click and download each JPG image to your computer so you can see the text better.Binksternet (talk) 20:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom Template:Did you know nominations/Miss Calypso

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Miss Calypso/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: H1nkles (talk · contribs) 20:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When I do an article review I like to provide a Heading-by-Heading breakdown of suggestions for how to make the article better. It is done in good faith as a means to improve the article. It does not necessarily mean that the article is not GA quality, or that the issues listed are keeping it from GA approval. I also undertake minor grammatical and prose edits. After I finish this part of the review I will look at the over arching quality of the article in light of the GA criteria. If I feel as though the article meets GA Standards I will promote it, if it does not then I will hold the article for a week pending work. H1nkles (talk) _{citius altius fortius} 20:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2] and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Review:

I made some grammatical and minor edits to tweak the article a little bit.
The only thing that bothered me was the use of the word "gigged". I find it a bit informal. That certainly isn't enough to keep it out of GA contention but I thought I'd mention it.
Overall I thought the writing was well done. The information covered the subject and it was balanced.
Refs are formatted ok and links are good.
I checked the image and a fair use tag is applied.
I will pass this article to GA, thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. H1nkles (talk) _{citius altius fortius} 00:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the pass, thanks. I'm embarrassed to admit that the section containing "gigged" was added by another editor, and it got past me. My inclination is to cut it, but I'll do some looking around for the Variety source and see if it's valid, most likely tomorrow. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 04:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Short album review in Billboard

Early Miss Calypso review in Billboard, aimed at the retailer who would be deciding whether to stock the album. Binksternet (talk) 20:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already included; see ref 13. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! Thanks for the reply. Binksternet (talk) 21:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

[2] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]