Talk:Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Pakistan may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Archives

Archive 1

Deletion of Talk page

As others have said, please don't. It preserves a record of discussions, and gives other editors a background to the issues and conflicts involved. Tearlach 17:50, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and deletions

The tone of this article is not acceptable, but the answer is not deletion of huge blocks of text without consensus. The answer is in citing sources, and trying to be impartial. More content is good for the reader, esp. when its verifiable and neutral. Sam Spade 00:29, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. However - I'd never bothered to look this up before - the Wikipedia:Verifiability#Checking verifiability guidelines do suggest that material that is persistently unverified should be moved to Talk page, and ultimately deleted if no verification is forthcoming.

All of the following quoted section needs sourcing, or it should go. Tearlach 12:08, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For now, it has to go. But anything can be replaced if it is very carefully and fully sourced of course -- sannse (talk)

Deleted sections, please discuss

[Text removed by sannse]

Please do not replace this without discussing with me or a Wikimedia Foundation representative. Thanks -- sannse (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source

I am leaving this thesis here, that talks about the subject a little, so if someone wants to expand the article, it can be used as a source (seems reliable, but not completely sure about it). -- SMS ^Talk 23:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]