Talk:Mind's Eye (The X-Files)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mind's Eye (The X-Files) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mind's Eye (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Mind's Eye (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 5) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 10, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mind's Eye (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 03:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Might be worth sticking the "if the gloves don't fit" line into context with the OJ Simpson trial.

I also generally tend to stick in a little information about who nominees lose their award to, it'd be especially useful for Taylor as that's a prominent enough award to pique curiosity, plus she was up against Veronica Cartwright, also for The X-Files(Cloris Leachman won that one).
"leading a strength, an anger, and a redeeming humour to a blind woman" -> should be "lending", but I don't have the book to hand right now to check whether the mistake is theirs or a typo here.

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Good. Wouldn't mind seeing this used to back up the Emmy nominations, though, as it's good to stick an official award source in as well as the third-party stuff.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Seems good to me. Wondering if there's anything on the DVDs to add to this, I'll dig my season 5 out in the morning to check.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Looks good.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Grand.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
I fiddled with the Hepburn image a little to resize it but it's free and used well.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Very little needing done here, just going to stick it on hold for the time being. Ping me again tomorrow if you need me to check the DVD extras, can't seem to find where I've left the box right now. GRAPPLE X 05:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those Emmy cites make it look a lot better. I believe I've addressed everything. Thanks for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Couldn't find anything on the special features to add; though I didn't watch the half-hour full season featurette. Ready to pass; well done! GRAPPLE X 11:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]