Talk:Microtome

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Microtome is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Science Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Need redirect here from "Vibratome" and "Tissue Sectioning System" maybe? (-lionfish)

de:Mikrotom

The German wiki has an FA on this. I have started on translation. Later I will post a request for a more capable speaker to review my work. Thanks User A1 (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have imported most of it. If someone wants to check the translation, that would be great. I had the most difficulty in the history section, so that is where the mistakes are going to be. Furthermore I have yet to bring the references over, if someone wants to do that sooner than I, that is fine :) User A1 (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh also Sled vs Sledge microtome? It seems that both are in use in scholarly literature. User A1 (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I imported the refs. Job is pretty much done, but the article needs attention from an expert, as I am neither an expert in the method nor an expert translator. User A1 (talk)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Microtome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Compresstome

The section on "compresstome" should maybe be removed. Compresstome seems to be a proprietary name for a model of vibrating microtome, and not really a different "type" of microtome. Does anyone have thoughts on this? Waughd (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem that anyone objects to the removal of this section (grounds for doing so are above), so I will remove it. Waughd (talk) 01:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion has been added once again and represents promotional text for a brand of microtome rather than being a specific type of microtome. Unfortunately the company have pursued this on many articles. I have deleted the text once again. 2A0A:EF40:65:3F01:17DA:6A85:4E1E:9C03 (talk) 06:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History

It is suggested that "razor blades" were used prior to the use of mechanical devices. Razor blades suggests the small foil-like rectangular replaceable blades for safety razors, whereas what were actually used were the devices known simply as razors. I recall in school in the 1950's cutting sections by hand by gripping plant material firmly in two semi-circles of hollowed-out pith and repeatedly using a slicing movement across the top with the razor. This would produce sections of various thicknesses, some of which were thin enough for optical microscopy. Incidentally the razors were of a specialist nature having one surface plane and the other bevelled (in contrast to a shaving razor which had two bevelled faces.Tommyboy 18:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Beaton (talk • contribs)