This article was nominated for deletion on 18 July 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
I have removed the section labeled Criticism for now because it was based entirely on this article published in David Gorski's self-published blog Respectful Insolence, which is a clear violation of WP:BLPSPS policy no matter how much of an expert Gorski is. Respectful Insolence is separate from Science-Based Medicine. I realize Gorski and Jillette was discussed previously, but remarkably nobody recognized BLP issues. People wishing to add reliably sourced criticism must due so in compliance with not only WP:NPOV but WP:BLP. --Animalparty! ([[User talkP but it is still used on many others. I find it unlikely other users are going to agree with you to remove this source because sometimes blogs by experts are aloud on Wikipedia. It appears to be a notable exception. Maybe this issue should be raised at WP:FTN and WP:RSN. Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I see you also rem:Animalparty|talk]]) 07:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that there was a bit of undue weight to the Gorski source it should not have been put in the lead in my opinion but if you do a search for "Respectful Insolence" on Wikipedia it is used on nearly 30 Wikipedia articles including biographies Judy Mikovits, Tyler Henry, Sharon Begley, Andrew Wakefield, Kathleen Seidel, David Wolfe and Brian Hooker. As well as a source to debunk various quackery including germ theory denialism, cupping therapy, Detoxification foot baths or the claims of Penta Water etc. It is clearly seen as a reliable source. You have removed Respectful Insolence as a source on Michael Klaper's BLP but it is still used on many others. I find it unlikely other users are going to agree with you to remove this source because sometimes blogs by experts are aloud on Wikipedia. It appears to be a notable exception. Maybe this issue should be raised at WP:FTN and WP:RSN. Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see you also removed the Gorski source on another BLP Sharyl Attkisson[2]. To be consistent we either need to remove this source from all BLPs or we need to restore it. We can't have the source being used on some articles and not others that would be inconsistent. There clearly needs to be discussion about this on a board so we can get a consensus view about how reliable Respectful Insolence is. WP:RSN might be a good idea. Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Respectful Insolence should be disused as a source for other BLPs, I simply haven't gotten around to them yet, and BLP violations are more pressing problems than inconsistency in source usage. Reliability of a source is a separate issue from self-publishing. . WP:SELFPUBLISH states: Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer, and WP:USESPS explores this in more depth. Respectful Insolence, whether hosted on ScienceBlogs or its own site, is entirely self-published, with the author being the sole editor and publisher. It may be reliable and even appropriate in certain cases, so long as its (i.e. Gorski's) views aren't granted disproportionate prominence and does not involve claims about living people. Wikipedians unfortunately tend to be less careful when writing about people that Gorski (and/or society at large) criticizes, as if a negative reception is a pass to circumvent WP:BLP or other policies. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
