Talk:Mercedes-AMG GT

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mercedes-AMG GT article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Acceleration numbers

Jaredclce, it's just a misunderstanding: both times are right, but the MB USA ones you quoted are for the 0-60 mph, mine from the Daimler press release are for the 0-100 km/h. However for an European car we'd better use the latter. – Cloverleaf II (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad -- I should have noticed that! I'm of the opinion we should use 0-60 mph, or at least mention it somewhere if you want to use the kph. Both work for me. Jaredclce (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked out WP:AUTOCONV, seems 0-100 km/h is the preferred measurement. Now that we're at it, what's the best way to cite the reference for the whole table? – Cloverleaf II (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm actually not sure about how to cite the reference for the whole table in the most effective way. I'll think about it though. Jaredclce (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a true grand tourer

Technically this is a true mid-engined sports car. Given its nimble handling and effectiveness on track, nobody who has driven the AMG GT (including the base model) would think this is a grand tourer. Oknevermind (talk) 06:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]