Talk:Me!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Me! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Taylor Swift Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Me! appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that spelling is fun, according to Taylor Swift?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Me! (Taylor Swift song).

Wikipedia

Rolling Stone Peak

Please stop changing the peak for "Me!" from 67 to 1 for the Rolling Stone Top 100. Please read WP:RSCHART. I will ping editors who continue to disrupt the charts section. There is no need for this article to get page-protected over something so trivial. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 17:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@41.202.219.78: Please read this as you were the most recent editor to have changed the position. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 17:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@213.147.97.35: Read above. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 14:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mixed reviews"

Curious why users "Jessintime" and "ThaddeusSholto" feel the need to continually disruptively change "mostly negative" to "mixed reviews" in the Critical Reception section given that almost every review quoted here is plainly negative. I invite them to discuss their points of view here, or add positive reviews from reputable sources, rather than further vandalize the page. Justdoinsomeedtits (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reviews are mixed. You are blanking content to remove anything positive and then altering it to claim all negative. This is disruptive. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "blanking" anything. For example? And do you think "a cloyingly goofy Disney-pop confection with an earworm chorus and a certain try-hard insidiousness to it". is a positive review? Do you think "anodyne" is a positive descriptor? Is this a reading comprehension issue? Justdoinsomeedtits

This edit removed over 2000 bytes of text. There was no valid reason to remove those review from reliable sources like Rolling Stone and Vanity Fair. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]