Talk:Max Liedtke

Something to hide?

If so, I would like to know what it is exactly... For the second time now in just one day, User:HerkusMonte removed the link to info about Albert Battel claiming that it is a part of the same book,[1] but retained a different link (not directly related to him) some hundred twenty pages below, in Google Books preview. Why? Poeticbent talk 17:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same source (that's a simple fact, not a "claim"). There's no need to link the same book (which is titled "Lexikon der Gerechten unter den Völkern, Deutsche und Österreicher", not "Albert Battel Akte 1979", btw) twice. I don't see anything that might be hidden by such a clarification, any reader should be able to scroll the preview. HerkusMonte (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't play the fool with me. "Battel, Albert Akte 1979" is a name of a separate section in the book on page 65... the cited book title followed in italics. Please read what Wikipedia:PAGELINKS#Linking to Google Books pages content guideline states, quote: No editor is required to add page links, but if another editor adds them, they should not be removed... I gave you the link to this guideline already in my edit summary. Next time, please have the courtesy to at least click on it. Poeticbent talk 19:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Section titled: "Battel, Albert Akte 1979" in Lexikon der Gerechten unter den Völkern, Deutsche und Österreicher :

http://books.google.de/books?id=UQK4-L64zfgC&lpg=PA65&dq=%22Battel%2C%20Albert%20%20Akte%201979%22&hl=de&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q=%22Battel,%20Albert%20%20Akte%201979%22&f=false

Your first version didn't mention the book title ("Lexikon der Gerechten") at all, instead you claimed a sub-sub-header as the booktitle. A reader might think a different source is used while it's in fact just a different page (Something to hide?). Next time, please have the courtesy to cite your sources properly. HerkusMonte (talk) 05:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]