Talk:Maw sit sit

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Myanmar

Maw sit sit is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

This was referenced from http://www.gemselect.com/other-info/about-maw-sit-sit.php. However, User:Vsmith say's that this source is not reliable. If anyone thinks differently, please do credit the source appropriately.Dyml (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to find better sources. One question for the original author: The article says that it has an RI index ranging from 1.52 to 1.74. I've found a source saying that the RI ranges from 1.52-4. That's a big difference. I'm going to go with what the source tells me, but if there is conflicting information with a credible source, then don't hesitate to present it. Keihatsu (talk) 07:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did find another source for refractive index: http://www.gemologyonline.com/mawsitsit.html and http://gemologyproject.com/wiki/index.php?title=Maw-sit-sit. It also states 1.52-1.74. I'll let you confirm which is most reliable. Thanks for the edits, the page looks good.Dyml (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]