Talk:Massage Envy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Draft for editor review

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

TCollinsEnvy (talk · contribs) has been paid by Massage Envy.

Hello! I work for Massage Envy and want to share some improvements to the company's Wikipedia article, which is currently very underdeveloped and focused almost exclusively on sexual misconduct allegations. There is much more company history to tell.

I recognize I have a conflict of interest, so I've saved a draft for editors to consider here: User:TCollinsEnvy/Massage Envy. You'll see I've left the sexual misconduct allegations mostly alone, but added an update the show what actions Massage Envy has taken in an attempt to address the problem. I believe the newly added content is neutral and appropriately sourced. Beyond the update to the allegations section, I've drafted a corporate overview summarizing the company's business model, services and leadership, expanded the history, and created subsections about marketing and sponsorships. All of the content is supported by reliable secondary sources to the best of my knowledge, and I've tried to be as neutral as possible. The current article has just 7 sources, one of which is the Massage Envy website, and the draft has 30 sources. I hope editors will see this an an improvement.

Can an editor review my proposed draft and copy over the updated and expanded text? I'm avoiding editing the article because of my conflict of interest, and appreciate any help or feedback. Thank you! User: TCollinsEnvy, March 12, 2019, 2 pm MST

Done Changes implemented. --Jordano53 (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jordano53: Hey, thanks! I noticed you kept the original misconduct accusations content at the bottom of the article. You'll notice this has been included in the "History" section (see third paragraph), along with the company's response. If you're ok with the content in the "History" section, can the original misconduct accusations content be removed now? Thanks. TCollinsEnvy (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Jordano53 (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again for your help. TCollinsEnvy (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of ownership

Not a wikipedia editor, so not going to get out of my lane so I figured I'd leave this here. ME has changed hands at least 2 times (maybe 3). Roark Capital Group purchased the company in '12. I think they still own it. A smaller equity firm purchased when they were ~300 units.

~MP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1521:8DD0:35F2:3491:6405:12 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]