Talk:Marvin Harrison Jr./GA1

GA Review

Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

The lead should be expanded to include his high school career.
- I expanded it but it was reverted due to perceived bloat, I'm going to leave it as is, rather than start an edit conflict.
  - And I reverted the change. MOS:LEAD is pretty clear that the the lead should summarize the entire article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonzo fan2007 Is there anything else that needs be fixed? Newtothisedit (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Newtothisedit, nope, I'll pass it shortly. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and high school career

Coming out of high school Harrison was a four star prospect ranked the nations 14th best receiver recruit., add "as" after "ranked"
- Done
as well as the schools atmosphere, "schools" should be "school's"
- Done

College career

In the Buckeyes season opener against Notre Dame, "Buckeyes" should be "Buckeyes'"
- Done
In his first game as the teams #1 receiver Harrison caught, add comma after "receiver"
- Done
The following week he had his second consecutive 100-yard game with 102 yards on 6 catches and two touchdowns in a blowout win over Toledo., should reference 29 be attributed to this sentence?
- Done

Images

Both images look good, freely licensed.

References

Be consistent with the website field. Either choose the .com or the name (i.e. Yahoo vs Yahoo.com)
- Changed to publication title for all sources except for sources from Cleveland.com. Cleveland.com is the name of the publication, hence why it was not changed.
Be consistent with the date fields (2023-01-16 vs January 16, 2023)
- Done
Be consistent with linking sources (Ref 5 has The Patriot-News linked, while other papers aren't linked).
- Done
Refs 17, 18 and 19 need access-date
Done
Spot checks look good.

Overall looks really good. Gonna put on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonzo fan2007 I believe that I have addressed everything. Newtothisedit (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.