This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2021, when it received 11,280,489 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report3 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Am I wrong thinking this article is pretty much ready for a GA nomination? It's ahead of the first three Phases as it has a written reception section and development looks good after a quick skim. To me it feels like it mostly just needs some CE to double check things. -- ZooBlazertalk22:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While this isn't a requirement, I think it could make sense to wait until all the Phase Four film and TV articles are GA before nominating this one. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It may not be a requirement but it makes sense. Like the first three Phases, I think it'll makes sense to nominate this as a Good Topic once we get to that point. -- ZooBlazertalk23:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also I feel, while the Phase has completed, we are still in the Multiverse Saga, and things in the future might reference back to this Phase, that would be beneficial to mention as part of a "complete" article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would think it would be best to gravitate towards gathering more reception and commentary on the prior Phases and the Infinity Saga to bring it up more to the level of detail and coverage of this Phase before focusing on nominating Four, or even Five. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why in this article and the ones for Phases Five and Six, we mention every single project in the lead unlike the previous phases' articles where only the first and last projects are mentioned? (aside from the Avengers films, which are remarkable). I personally think it's a bit unnecessary, given the amount of projects is much bigger in the new phases and those are specifically listed below in their respective sections (films, series, specials, etc) AxGRvS (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]