Talk:Mars surface color

A fact from Mars surface color appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the planet Mars appears red primarily because of a ubiquitous layer of dust containing nanophase ferric oxides?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mars task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Color B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

"One of its earliest names, Har decher, literally meant "Red One."" Who called it by that? What language? "Angaraka and Lohitanga" Why are those names indicative of being malignant? --dalegrett (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Egyptians did. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 08:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As is already noted in the article, whoops. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 08:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read and re-read but don't see what you are referring to with "As is already noted" can you clarify? Iwasking (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This caught my eye immediately upon viewing the article! Those Indian gods are associated with anger and war. Mars is associated with war, so anger is malignant? War is usually bad so why is that not malignant? Iwasking (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heresy

Call me crazy, but Mars is brown. In the picture on this page the surface looks brown. On the actual page for Mars, it looks brown, beige or even yellowy in one picture. It doesn't look remotely red. -OOPSIE- (talk) 09:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NASA video on this: Is Mars Really Red? Fotaun (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please verify the information in the sentence about Gusev and Meridiani

I have rewritten the first sentence of the second paragraph of the section The reddish dust. I had to surmize what the original author was trying to say, and someone should verify that I (and the original author) got it right. Also, someone should find a reference for the statement. Here is how the statement reads now:

The mass fraction of chlorine and sulfur in the dust is greater than that reported by the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity in the soil types at their respective lending sites, Gusev crater and Meridiani Planum.

Here is how it read before:

The mass fraction of chlorine and sulfur in the dust is greater than that in soil types at Gusev and Meridiani.

I made the correction because I, for one, had to look up what Gusev and Meridiani were; if one does not know that, the sentence looks quite puzzling. Reuqr (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mars surface color. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090925011644/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/space/20090921/sc_space/howmarsturnedredsurprisingnewtheory to http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090921/sc_space/howmarsturnedredsurprisingnewtheory

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hypothesis of oxygen rich early Mars atmosphere

Suggestion - the article could this hypothesis Early Mars atmosphere 'oxygen-rich' before Earth's

More details here: Mars had oxygen-rich atmosphere 4000m years ago

Robert Walker (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]