Talk:Mark Burgess (computer scientist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

MarkBurgess (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Markburgess osl (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Mbosl (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could somebody PLEASE remove the scary boxes from this page now. It's humiliating to me personally. If I were a Havard University Professor, no one would question the content, even though I know many colleagues whose pages were written by their university publicist or even themselves. Why do I get picked on? The small corrections I have made over the years are being flagged to an unreasonable level as if I somehow wrote everything. I did not write this page--so WTF? It's double standards on steroids. MarkBurgess (talk) 11:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I (as the subject of this page) have checked through the information and will attest to its general correctness. :) (Mark Burgess)

The notion of an equilibrium or steady state operation thus became the baseline, replacing arbitrary thresholds used in the monitoring software of the day. The software CFEngine became the proof of concept platform using these methods for system state anomaly detection, from 2002 to the present, but received little use. Modern monitoring companies Circonus (founded 2010) and Vivid Cortex (founded 2012) now implement these concepts in dedicated software products.

The statement of little use is utter bullshit which is repeated over and over... Maybe some people actually believe that. Truth is CFEngine has been the most widely used configuration management software and also, even now, still has substantial use especially in very large environments. Both due it's age / maturity / scalability it's reigned in environments with many thousands of systems with just few expections. Only Opsware (HP SA) and later (post-ERLANG rewrite, which was done specfically to become a CFEngine alternative for Facebook) have proven as viable alternatives. Yeah, so if you need a reference as to CFEngine scalability, refer to the Facebook talk, and keep in mind that their decision to switch was based on the very old CFEngine version 2.

212.71.19.58 (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the subject of this page. How can I assist someone in cleaning it up, since I am not allowed to do this myself? There is plenty of reference material at markburgess.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkBurgess (talk • contribs) 12:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MarkBurgess your own website is not the kind of reference material we are looking for here. If you can point out some independent, secondary sources here that would be a good start. Melcous (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see 40 references (looking now), on which a tiny handful are to my website - someone has done a very good job of tracking things down. Not referring to my website would be like not admitting Apple has relevant information on its website, or that university web pages were not impartial. Denying obvious facts because of the source is irrational. I think you are a) not up to date on what is actually there, and b) maintaining a personal vendetta on this issue as a matter of bureaucratic principle. Please reconsider. If I were able to formally complain about your singular objection, I would consider it because you are clearly applyinig standards that are not common for other people I know who have pages. I would rather tap into your rational common sense here. MarkBurgess (talk) 12:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You asked a question, I answered it. Your response is to start making personal attacks in bad faith. I'm out. Someone else can try to help you. Melcous (talk) 13:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]