Talk:Mario Bros./GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Pass, after several tweaks on my part. I'd strongly recommend putting this through a peer review though. -- Sabre (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
The fair use rationales are rather weak. I'd try bolstering them before taking the article any further

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
You could probably use a better caption on Image:Mario_Bros._Gameplay.gif
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the assessment, though I don't think I'll be taking it any further. I think I've milked as much information from the Internets as I can. The gameplay section is pretty much done, as is the ports and follow-ups section. Development and Reception may grow if I can find some print sources for the reviews, maybe some sales, and look around for interviews ABOUT Mario Bros. (maybe delve into development information about later versions). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]