Talk:Margaret Chan

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (20)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (294)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,058)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,503) • Stub-Class articles (6,666)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (380) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[World Health Organization#Directors-General of WHO|Director-General of the World Health Organization]] The anchor (#Directors-General of WHO) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Image

The current image was uploaded with no copyright information and will probably be deleted within the week. Can anyone find a free image that we can use? Nishkid 64 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks K ideas for uploading a new image of Margaret Chan (one that is actually with copyright information and won't be deleted). Nishkid 64 01:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BA in Home Econ

I think Chan got her BA in Home Economics at The Hong Kong Institute of Education, but the cited source says she got her degree at Western's Brescia University College. Either way, she didn't get her BA in Home Economics at the University of Western Ontario...--Ivy ST 07:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Never mind, she couldn't have got the BA from Northcote...--Ivy ST 07:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the removal of "Handling of the SARS outbreak (Legislative Council of Hong Kong report)" section

First of all, I would like to thank the admin Nishkid64 for taking an interest in the article about Dr Margaret Chan even the effect of User: Nishkid64's action was to delete the whole section I spent a lot of time in creating.

I would like to make a note that the tone in the comments accompanying Nishkid64's action do seems harsh, "The whole section on the SARS response was taken from government source. Don't copy word-for-word, but summarize what happened!"

First, I wish to, for the record, make a distinction between, "taken from government source" and "quoting and referencing legislative council sources". "taken" seems to imply simple copying without proper reference nor thought in the action of inserting the text. I am, of course, in very much disagreement of the implications.

The reason for the original intend of the direct quoted reference was to avoid any potential appearance of whether the "summary" was fair compare to the original report text. Upon further reflection, I have somewhat rewritten the section and hope this will read better.

Again, I appreciate the comment by User: Nishkid64 even though the comment attached to the text removal seems a bit harsh. Well, we are all learning, I suppose.

– Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - a quote by Kevin Roberts 16:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh? I used an exclamation mark at the end of my comment just in case you decided to add it back. My only complaint was the way the whole section was written; it had appeared that the section was a direct read from those legislative council sources. I totally think the section was appropriate, and I appreciate your work, and I apologize for failing to leave a note on your talk page regarding my reasons for removing that section from the article. Currently, I would like to see that section written in encyclopedic form. In this particular section, I would like it if you could summarize in your own words, using the sources as references for your additions to the page. Some things stick out like, "In addition, Dr CHAN..." CHAN? Couldn't you just summarize what the assessment had established? I'll try to make some corrections, as well. Nishkid 64 17:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nishkid64,

Thanks for your new message. I made some new changes and new summaries. See what you think. Again, it is truly a balance of quotes and my "summary". I don't make it a habit of critizing someone on the news and holding an important role very lightly. But it is a very important matter and that is why I want to make it very careful not to misrepresent or misquote anything.

I would love to have your input on making this entry better. Glad to hear you think this is also very important information, considering many of the information referenced were in Chinese articles which is not that useful for non-Chinese readers.

By the way, it was that "!" that you used at the end of your comment which made it "harsh". I say, positive stuff it is ok for "!". Negative stuff like taking out a whole section, ahhh, may be avoid the "!". Although I understand it is tough to be an admin. (smile) And I also know not to add the text right back without any work.

– Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - a quote by Kevin Roberts 17:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current version still reads a bit too long and verbatim to me. Can we condense the reactions to her record during the SARS outbreak even more? A general assessment should be good enough for this section, and individual remarks can serve as references to the main text -- definitely no need to paraphrase so many individuals' voices here. (btw, I'm not an admin :) --John Seward 15:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Condensed and summarised. I have removed the quotes from legislators as they are supposed to be reflected already in the report by the legislative council cited as reference in the criticism paragraph. --John Seward 08:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, John. =) Nishkid 64 20:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4 Chinese characters

Why does her Chinese name have four Chinese characters instead of three? Badagnani (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Moral Integrity"

"Chan's moral integrity has been publicly challenged; the WHO definition of pandemic was relaxed in 2009." This statement needs to be fleshed out if it is to be included, it is nonsensical right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.142.111 (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing polio issues.

Hello sir how are you. Shafiq Ahmad (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian

The claim in the lead that she is "Hong Kong-Canadian" is not supported by the source cited. The source says she is from the People's Republic of China. Studying for a few years in country X does not automatically make one X-ian. If she is referred to as Canadian in reliable sources, it would be good to add it into the article. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 16:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a source in the infobox, which I have copied over to the lead. _dk (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That source also doesn't say that she is Canadian - it says that she studied in Canada for a few years and then returned to Hong Kong. That's not the same as being identified as "Canadian". --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From the relevant passage of that source, I quote:

“

Upon her elevation to the WHO, her identity as the first Chinese national to hold such a prominent position on a UN body was widely cited internationally, although her Canadian citizenship was not. She has defended her right to dual citizenship, but is also believed to hold an SAR passport.

”

_dk (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see, missed that bit when I was reading the article, my bad. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019233426/http://time.blogs.com/global_health/2006/07/whos_next_at_wh.html to http://time.blogs.com/global_health/2006/07/whos_next_at_wh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503152953/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=7058&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040710&sear_year=2004 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=7058&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20040710&sear_year=2004

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Margaret Chan - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011 crop.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Wang Longde" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wang Longde. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Zanhe (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View dispute for the section titled "Director of Health in Hong Kong, 1994–2003" and for the section titled "Director-General of WHO, 2006–2017"

NPOV dispute over section titled "Director of Health in Hong Kong, 1994–2003"

This section has a lot of newspaper sources used as references and the content appears written in a very sensationalist manner perhaps reflecting the newspaper sources' writing, the content appears like it is from very sensationalized newspaper stories from the time it happened, this section really needs more sober reliable sources to verify claims here made by those newspaper stories; it has been years since this time so sources other than newspaper stories are available now.

News like AFP and Politico are not tabloids and are not sensational. While more recent sources would be appreciated, a lack of them does not automatically create an NPOV problem. DifferenceTone (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)DifferenceTone[reply]

NPOV dispute over section titled "Director-General of WHO, 2006–2017"

This section has sensationalized sounding content typical of newspaper media that is being used as sources here and the content makes accusations that she was criticized but does not say who or what organizations in particular did the accusations. Like the previous section mentioned this section also needs more sober reliable sources to verify claims here and like the section above it has been years since this time so sources other than newspaper stories are available.

In fact the sources do cite the organizations accusing Chan, and news like AFP and Politico are not tabloids and are not sensational While more recent sources would be appreciated, a lack of them does not automatically create an NPOV problem. DifferenceTone (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)DifferenceTone[reply]