Talk:March 2007 lunar eclipse

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 28 August 2007, see discussion.
Limited keep (with qualifications), 24 June 2006, see discussion.

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System / Eclipses Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Eclipses task force.

Untitled

I don't think a separate article is needed- in no way it is an exceptional occurence of the lunar eclipse and so all the details could easily be included in the main article.

I'm inclined to agree, but as of 00:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC) it's not even over yet! Peter Grey 00:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do think we should have a page on it. I came to find information on this specific eclipse. But I've already said this in the AfD nomination. Korinkami 09:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do think that a total eclipse is worth a dedicated article, to display specific information on the event that could hardly be displayed in the main article on lunar eclipses. Also take a look at this suggestion I posted to improve the quality of the article with better pictures. --DarTar 10:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of lunar eclipses

I began work on a list of lunar eclipses, using the same format as the list of solar eclipses. So far it only contains the two 2007 eclipses, but there are 228 more this century and there are another 230 from the 20th century that we may want to include. Please place further discussion on the article's talk page. ··· rWd · Talk ··· 08:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Shouldn't there be a template with the archive to the AfD discussion on this page? It seems to me that such a template makes it far less likely that someone else will come along and delete it. Sincerely, your friendly nominator for deletion in this last instance, IvoShandor 08:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like how no one answers. Pretty cool. IvoShandor 16:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the afd summary template.- Gilliam 03:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stat table

I tried a sample statistic table (for evaluation or improvement or rejection(?!)). I uploaded a quick graphic of the moon's path across the earth's shadow. Obviously the NASA graphic is better. I appreciate a wider view map that shows a little of constellations and stars as well as the earth's shadow. A worldmap graphic showing visibility (as the Nasa page has) would be great addition too.

Incidentally for graphics, I see the NASA page says on eclipses:[1]

Permission is freely granted to reproduce this data when accompanied by an acknowledgment: "Eclipse Predictions by Fred Espenak, NASA/GSFC"

The main immediate value of a wiki-copy is perhaps more flexible/creative formatting and cross-linking options.

Tom Ruen 01:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of eclipse photos at commons!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lunar_eclipse_of_2007_March_3 SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 22:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on March 2007 lunar eclipse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926230107/http://www.astroversum.nl/nieuwsarchief/032007/nieuws.0503200701.html to http://www.astroversum.nl/nieuwsarchief/032007/nieuws.0503200701.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on March 2007 lunar eclipse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Penumbral lunar eclipse 2006 March 14 Warrenton VA.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Penumbral lunar eclipse 2006 March 14 Warrenton VA.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]