Talk:Man, Economy, and State

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

No info as to the importance of the work?

This might sound like an immature comment, but here it goes. For being such a seminal work, that introduction sucks. If I ever get a chance, I'll see if I can improve it. If not, this would be something to consider adding to as a note to anybody who's interested. Lighthead ^þ 00:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not original research

It is not original research to write a summary that merely describes a book's contents in shorter length, without attempting a literary analysis or anything like that. I believe WP:USEPRIMARY is on my side when it gives the example of a novel. It would be hard for an encyclopedia to cover books if they could not be described like I did, and there is no indication in the rules about original research that forbidding this was anything like the intent. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did an AI write the summary? Llll5032 (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I think Power and Market should be merged here, since most references to it have been to the edition that publishes it together with Man, Economy and State, and as such, it is hard to find sources specifically about P&M rather than to both books as a unit. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]