Talk:Malvaviscus
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The number and identity of species in Malvaviscus is unclear. The latest revision that I've seen, Turner & Mendenhall, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80(2): 439-457 (1993), recognises 4 species, but rejects or excludes 2, M. candidus and M. palmatus, of the 3 species recognised by Schery's earlier monograph (Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29(3): 183-244 (1942)). As I have only seen the abstract I am unaware of the grounds on which this is done. M. penduliflorus is recognised as a cultivar, rather than as species. Again I am unaware of the grounds on which this is done.
Kubitzki & Bayer, Fam. Gen. Vasc. Pl. V (2003) appear to follow Turner & Mendenhall. Lavateraguy 21:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Malvaviscus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605235245/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?7218 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?7218
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)