Talk:Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 7, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Closure
[edit] Resolved
@Truflip99: FYI!
---Another Believer (Talk) 14:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Truflip99: Do we need "{{MAX infobox header|Mall/SW 5th Ave|blue|red}}" in the infobox two times? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: One of them is for the other platform, 4th Avenue. --Truflip99 (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Truflip99, Ah, I see the difference now, my mistake! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: One of them is for the other platform, 4th Avenue. --Truflip99 (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 15 November 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: withdrawn (non-admin closure) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations → Mall stations (Portland, Oregon)
- Library/Southwest 9th Avenue and Galleria/Southwest 10th Avenue stations → Library and Galleria stations (Portland, Oregon)
- Pioneer Courthouse/Southwest 6th and Pioneer Place/Southwest 5th stations → Pioneer Courthouse and Pioneer Square stations
- Yamhill District and Morrison/Southwest 3rd Avenue stations → Yamhill District and Morrison stations
– The current page names are quite long and would require a lot of effort to be typed in on any potential reader's part. These new ,shorter page names would get general context of the MAX stations, but would be easier to find. (The current page names could become redirects.) These names are just my ideas, if there are any other shorter names that gain consensus I am fine with that. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
SupportYBG (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)- On further consideration, I would suggest withdrawing this RM and starting a new one that covers all max stations, not just the double ones. I think we should use the station names as listed on [1]. This would eliminate the extraneous "Avenue" and change the directionals to 1- or 2-letter abbreviations. I would also suggest eliminating the slash (/) that trimet includes. This char is allowed in main space page names, but it doesn’t work well – see the link at the top of this talk page that is supposed to go to the article page but the target is truncated at the first "/". YBG (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will do that, as that seems like a better idea. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- On further consideration, I would suggest withdrawing this RM and starting a new one that covers all max stations, not just the double ones. I think we should use the station names as listed on [1]. This would eliminate the extraneous "Avenue" and change the directionals to 1- or 2-letter abbreviations. I would also suggest eliminating the slash (/) that trimet includes. This char is allowed in main space page names, but it doesn’t work well – see the link at the top of this talk page that is supposed to go to the article page but the target is truncated at the first "/". YBG (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment While I agree that the current titles are a mouthful, the proposed titles seem to be WP:OR. What do reliable sources call these stations? 162 etc. (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- I had the same thought as 162 etc. @Truflip99, SJ Morg, and SounderBruce: Hoping you all might weigh in here, since you do transit-related work and have edited this article before. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've added some more that would fall under the scope of this discussion. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you cite reliable sources for any of this? 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Making it shorter under WP:CONCISE? thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you cite reliable sources for any of this? 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- GA-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- GA-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- GA-Class Stations articles
- WikiProject Stations articles
- Wikipedia requested images of train stations
- GA-Class Rapid transit articles
- Unknown-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles