Talk:Major League Baseball relocations of 1950s–1960s

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!

Why Cincinnati Did Not Get An American League Team

"It is unknown why no second team was placed in Cincinnati to compete with the Cincinnati Reds."

American League president Ban Johnson was a sports editor in Cincinnati during the early 1890s and knew the market well enough to know that the city could not support two major league teams. The city tried in 1891 with the National League Reds, on the west side, and American Association Kelly's Killers, on the east side, and proved to be a total disaster.

SCSRdotorg (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Major League Baseball relocation of 1950s–60s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

promotes a point of view

I'm not an expert on site rules, but this page seems to violate them. Clearly, the writer(s) feel that franchise moves were primarily good and necessary, making the page read like copy from the MLB offices. The moves were controversial "in some circles" -- you mean like the fans in the cities that lost teams? Who else would you expect to care?

Granted, the game needed to expand with the country's population, but that's only one element here: multiple teams moved more than once (Braves, A's), and some of the moves were eastward (Browns to Baltimore, Braves to Atlanta). Washington got a new Senators team, for a decade, at which point they too left town.

Pro sports franchises are privately owned, and so have the right to move, but when they do so, it rips at the heart of the prior home-city: we're seeing this now with the expected moves of the NFL's Oakland Raiders and San Diego Chargers. The page could present both sides without sounding like an MLB press release. ProfessorAndro (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]