Talk:Mahika Sharma

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Assam Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as Low-importance).

Unreliable sources

These are all unreliable sources.

Magicalassam.com
Indiaopines.com
Bollywoodlife.com
Sulekha.com
Goassam.com
Entertainment-tadka.com
santabanta.com
just-showbiz.com
justbollywood.in
Indiainfoline.com
Tellychakkar.com
Pinkvilla.com
Tellytadka.net
partidintime.blogspot.in
bollywooddhamaka.in
tellymasala.co.in
evaweekly.com
moviesamachar.com
starsunfolded.com
biratonline.com

—- Managerarc™^talk 04:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If those are unreliable sources. Then why dont wiki ban those sites. As *India forums links are ban here. Links from popular sites are always welcome here. Wikipedia is for all and most of the links likes Maggical Assam is top blog around northeast and so is Tellychakkar and Bollywoodlife in tellydom in India. So as per me the issue is not appropriate. Many pages are just alive on bollywoodlife and tellychakkar too. Indianeditor22 (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist. Only spammers are blacklisted. Regarding reliable sources, please see the "Guidelines on sources" section on WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force for a list of sources considered reliable. If you think above sources meet the reliability criteria at WP:RS, please develop consensus first. - Managerarc™^talk 19:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, the sources you use must bereliable; that is, they must be sources that exercise some form of editorial control and have some reputation for fact checking and accuracy. Wikipedia justify those sites which carry editor controll... the sites u reffer to be unreliable its not east for normal man to get publish over till they are notable. So its justify that we can reffer those sites in an article with many reliable sites, such as Times of India, Hindustan Times, The states man and few more. So kindly remove your issue tag. Thanks I appriciate you look for reliable sources in an article to avoid vendalism over wikipedia. Indianeditor22 (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The tag would not be removed unless all the unreliable sources are removed and/or replaced with reliable sources. - Managerarc™^talk 13:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added few sources

I have heard a lot about the actress. Since took the initiative to add few good sources I found on her. Lily Flingg (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]