Talk:Magnet (magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

This is an almost completely subjective and non-NPOV - particularly the paragraph alleging that (for example) the New Pornographers are "light pop" or "alternative country." I'll be subjective over here and note that, as a long-time subscriber, the magazine's been consistent in covering indie-rock generally, although (as noted) its range does extend beyond that. I'd argue the focus has always been indie-rock, primarily (that list of cover artists is a good example of various "hot" bands during the years indicated). I'd suggest that, if you want to *imply* a change in direction, point to something objective (like who's on the cover or featured in major articles) to support that, rather than merely alleging a rather subjective notion of a "shift" in perspective (along with an implicit pejorative in "light pop"). 2fs 02:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBB

"As of June 2012, eight complaints have been filed with the Better Business Bureau have been brought against Magnet Magazine for not delivering on subscriptions and refusing refunds. As of June 2012, the BBB gives Magnet a rating of C- based on these complaints." <- Does this information really belong into the Wikipedia. Eight complaints in 3 years? -- 91.64.48.15 (talk) 09:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]