Talk:Madonna and Child (Duccio, Metropolitan)

Metropolitan Museum of Art Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of Art. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Metropolitan Museum of ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Metropolitan Museum of ArtTemplate:WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of ArtMetropolitan Museum of Art
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Carbon Dating?

Can't they just clear up the controversy by analyzing a chip of wood off the back or something?—Chowbok ☠ 22:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity, neutrality?

James Beck says that this is forgery of later years (and im pretty convinced by that ISBN 978-88-8398-043-5). Article is really biased and not neutral either, cos heavily based on what painting owners is saying. And, not suprisingly, they louds it clearly.

Next, it states "This iconic image of Madonna and Child, seen throughout the history of western art". And then "accessible to scholars for only half a century", so ? They are supposing, that this painting is the "mother" of the all other similar paintings ? And that is clearly untrue. Article really needs some other quotations beside painting owners. --Submixster (talk) 23:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]