Talk:Máiría Cahill

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

It is requested that an image or photograph of Máiría Cahill be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Máiría vs. Mairia

Máiría is used by her own twitter account (@mairiac31), Irish Times, RTE, UTV and BBC. Snappy (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article be at "Máiría" (with fadas) or "Mairia" (no fadas)?

Sources with fadas:

8,630 Google News hits, incognito window.

Sources without fadas:

The Labour Party website: [1]
The Oireachtas Twitter account (as retweeted by Cahill): [2]
62,700 Google News hits, incognito window.

Cahill herself:

Cahill uses "Máiría" (with fadas) on Twitter, but "Mairia" (no fadas) on her blog. Her blog links to newspaper articles she's written, where she doesn't use fadas.[3] [4] [5] and many more.

Propose moving back to "Mairia Cahill". (ping Snappy). Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 19:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional source using fadas: the Oireachtas website membership list. Any thoughts, Snappy? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a mess. Different sources say different things, even the subject of the article uses fadas sometimes and sometimes she doesn't. So since Oireachtas members database use fadas, I go with that, as it is the official record. Snappy (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

I've added Irish and British news sources for allegations, awards for the BBC NI documentary, personal awards and on becoming a Labour candidate & Senator. I've also corrected the date for waiving anonymity, as a complainant of sexual abuse, from 2010 to 2014 when BBC NI documentary was broadcast, citing a BBC report. Is the Youtube reference to video of speech on receiving an award a valid source, or unsuitable? Wikopedian (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Máiría Cahill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tribune.ie/news/article/2010/jan/17/grand-niece-of-provo-legend-endured-horrific-sexua/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]