This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
@DerbyCountyinNZ: The problem is that would make the entire List of the verified oldest people list WP:OR/WP:SYNTH as well. It even says at the top under 100 Oldest Women "The list including known and validated supercentenarians who died before 2015 was compiled by the Gerontology Research Group (GRG). Later cases are included in more recent GRG data, with administrative reports or press coverage as supplementary sources, as indicated in the table." Most of the top 10 names are sourced solely by GRG. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers, Tempelz, and Meredithslota: All of you have reverted edits saying Randon has been "wheelchair-bound/confined to a wheelchair", and I'd like to ask why. I am aware that some consider the phrase ableist, but I also know that there has been no Wikipedia discussion saying these terms are not allowed. 🇺🇦ChicdatBawk to me!11:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Chicdat, "used a wheelchair" was first introduced on June 2, and you first changed it to "wheelchair-bound" on June 13, citing MOS:EUPH. "wheelchair-bound" was removed again on July 4, and there's been a slow-motion (with flare-ups) edit war ever since with no talk page discussion. Let me know if that history is incorrect.Assuming I'm correct, "used a wheelchair" is preferable here for three reasons:
"wheelchair-bound" is not supported by the source, which just says "in a wheelchair"
since the RfC you alluded to, both styles have been acceptable (or at least, there's no consensus against their use), and in such situations, the original style should be retained per MOS:VAR
some editors and readers do consider "wheelchair-bound" to be ableist, so there should be some affirmative, compelling reason to use it here.
No substantive response for a few days now. I was responding mainly to "wheelchair-bound", but would say the same things about "confined to a wheelchair". Pending some new participation in the next couple days, I plan to revert per the above, mainly the WP:NOCON of it all. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
