Jump to content

Talk:Lone worker monitoring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lone worker issues

[edit]

It is estimated that 22% of the 31.2million UK working population, that is 6.8 million people, work alone on a regular basis. They spend periods of their day outside of direct contact or supervision of thier colleagues and management.

As workers we are under the responsibility of our employers during our work hours, and the environment in which we work must be as safe as it can be. Our employers have to accept responsibility for our safety whether we are in the office, on the shop floor, in a vehicle, in the street or if we knock on someones door to make a home visit - in all those situations our safety is the responsibility of the employer.

In businesses and organisations that take a responsible view they will understand that lone workers are especially open to risks which cannot be managed. They will therefore write a [Lone Worker] Policy and work with staff to explain it, make sure it is sensible, and then follow up its implementation to ensure it is being followed. The HSE make a point of checking these policies when they make their visits - and then audit compliance at worker/user level.

There are lone worker devices, systems, training and risk assessments to minimise the risk to lone workers available on the market. [1] (http://safetyline.ca)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lone worker monitoring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]