Talk:Lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.power-technology.com/features/feature-world-worst-nuclear-power-disasters-chernobyl/
- Triggered by
\bpower-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I've pruned this page
[edit]I've removed a bunch of links relating to nuclear tests, nuclear submarines, and, oddly, a list of US naval nuclear reactors. This page is for listing nuclear disasters and radiation incidents, not for just tossing stuff in because it is nuclear related. Try to avoid crapping the page up with such POV pushing. Jtrainor (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625044818/http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/206/206749.pdf to http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/206/206749.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
[edit]In the section “Individual disasters, incidents and sites” I've taken out the entries “1945 Hiroshima” and “1945 Nagasaki”. I don't think they qualify as either disasters or incidents. They were acts of war, and they took place essentially as they were planned. I know there are folks who will argue that all wars are disasters, and so on; but it remains that this article is principally on the topic of events caused by circumstances beyond people's control or knowledge, or by people's failures to adhere to protocols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.32 (talk) 00:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Radiation release near submarine base
[edit]Not clear how bad this is, possibly up to an INES 3 but its being taken pretty seriously.
References
=This is from 2019. This editor did not leave a name or timestamp? I thought it was auto generated.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 22:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)