Jump to content

Talk:List of Intel chipsets/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Intel 100 Series - Sunrise Point

Intel® GL82CM236 PCH - Mobile Workstation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.47.181.53 (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

440LX

A maximum of 512 MiB SDRAM is given for the 440LX chipset in the table. Is this an official specification? The 440LX chipset (often or generally?) works with 768 MiB SDRAM. I've two systems of this kind, both equipped with 768 MiB SDRAM = 3× 256 MiB PC-133 CL3 (running at PC-66 CL2) double-sided organized modules. The boards are "Intel AL440LX" and "Asus P2L97-S". Processors "Pentium II 333/512/66 Deschutes" and "Celeron 533/128/66 Mendocino (with slotket)" work on both boards with 768 MiB SDRAM. --Arnulf zu Linden (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it is the official limit set by intel. 512MB SDRAM or 1024 EDO. -- ziv 16:57, 04 Jan 2017 (GMT+2)

Sunrise Point, Union Point (chipset) and Cannon Point. Please fix. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 18:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

CHIPSETS vs NM nano meter technology vs Manufacturers

181210 title: CHIPSETS vs NM nano meter technology vs Manufacturers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_chipsets#External_links

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_nanometer

hi, hope ok to write here. i finally found a comparison of architecture vs nm (nanometer) tech at the bottom of this article. it would really help if the nanometer tech spec(ification) were included in the tables above, as another column?

what would need (even if a rough outline - reference), to what boards / manufacturers are using, what nanometer specs. 

 (eg:  dell hp etc, if can include models / some general technology description)

pardon if that info is already present but i don't see it.

this seems critical to every person visiting, having to do an in depth study, to try to connect the dots. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DBFRAM (talk • contribs) 21:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

855PM TDP is clearly wrong

Currently the table shows a TDP of 5.7W for the 855PM, which does NOT have integrated graphics. It makes no sense that the power consumption for this part would be higher than the 855GM which does have integrated graphics. Not to mention that 855PM chips can be seen in laptops without any cooling, not even a heatsink. This Japanese page provides a more believable figure of 1.8W for the 855PM: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/492/492382/2/ 108.183.39.162 (talk) 18:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Pre-chipset Situation

Can we use pre-8086 microprocessor chipset information that dates back to Intel 4004 in the pre-chipset situation? Rjluna2 (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

TDP figures

The 855PM northbridge that omits integrated video has a TDP of only 1.8W. References: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/492/492382/2/ http://www.intel.eu/content/dam/doc/design-guide/855pm-chipset-platform-guide.pdf 172.58.139.149 (talk) 17:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

X79 Native PCI

Does the X79 chipset really have a native PCI lane or not? Intel's own spec page seems to suggest it does, but several sources online claim otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.103.131 (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Intel_chipsets/Archive_2&oldid=1264992871"