Talk:List of Chinese administrative divisions by illiteracy rate

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link to the source

Question, is there a link to the source of this, particularly I think the article should first define the measure of illiteracy used in the yearbook, and also personally I would like to know which language is used in the measure for the Autonomous Regions, for Tibet is Tibetan used or Chinese when measuring illiteracy there? Thanks in advance! --68.239.70.72 21:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separate out Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau figures, as they are clearly not comparable

I have moved the figures for Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau into a separate table. They are from a different source (the CIA world fact book), for different years (2001-3 instead of 2010), and the numbers are so greatly different as to imply different methodologies. Therefore, to incorporate these figures into the mainland Chinese ranking is misleading. (It is completely implausible, even from a pure economic point of view, that there is more illiteracy in Hong Kong than in Hainan, for instance). 203.218.200.38 (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]