A fact from Life of Buddha in art appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Japanese parodies of scenes from the life of Buddha in art include arrangements of vegetables?
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Japanese parodies of scenes from the Life of Buddha in art include arrangements of vegetables (partial example pictured)? Source: Pal, Pratapaditya, Light of Asia : Buddha Sakyamuni in Asian art, 1984, p. 128, LACMA, ISBN 087587116X, Internet archive; or "Already in the Edo period quite a few light-hearted parodies had been created of the parinirvana, paintings such as Parinirvana of Ariwara no Narihira (Narihira nehan-zu, Tokyo National Museum) by Hanabusa Itcho- (1652–1724) and Fruit and Vegetable Parinirvana (Kaso nehan-zu, Kyoto National Museum) by Ito- Jakuchu- (1716– 1800)". from the British Museum here
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced generally and is neutral. A QPQ is done. I have added a few [citation needed] since at those points the referencing was unclear to me - but overall the article is excellent. In terms of the hook and the image, I don't think the image of the gourd is very clear at the scale on DYK - I couldn't tell what it was at all. I would welcome an ALT hook, perhaps with one of the fasting buddha images, since they are so striking. Huge kudos to taking the topic on and for writing such a clear article! Lajmmoore (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't miss it at all, and have been very busy finding book refs for things illustrated immediately next to the text, and so on. But I think this now finished, Lajmmoore. Johnbod (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Johnbod - thanks so much for adding the references in, sourcing looks really good now. I was thinking about the hook you already put up, and I think it might work the caption included the word gourd, or similar? Otherwise, if you do have another hook up your sleeve, that would be great. Thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is an awesome article, but unfortunately, the image isn't great at the small size required for DYK. Might I suggest something along the lines of (this is kind of rough):
ALT1 ... that scene popularly depicted from Life of Buddha in art is Buddha being sheltered from the rain by the snake-king Mucalinda?
I don't think so. There is no ambiguity in this case, and it gives a title with too many short words (5). I've set up a redirect though. Johnbod (talk) 14:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]