Talk:Legendaddy (album)

Legendaddy (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 22, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Legendaddy (album) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 6 February 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Legendaddy (album) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 14 December 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Legendaddy (album) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 16 September 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Latin music: Reggaeton Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reggaeton task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Legendaddy (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

Many reverts, and a large content dispute between whether it is his 7th or 8th album
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

As I read through the article, I am going to leave my suggestions for improvements down here

~~The Tour section should be renamed to Touring~~
~~The tour section needs to be updated, as the tour is over, the san juan concerts were cancelled, not postponed~~
~~Image in the section needs to be updated too~~

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Thanks for reviewing the article! I've renamed the Tour section to Touring, and I want to clarify that the tour has not ended yet, as the Puerto Rico concerts were never cancelled. Daddy Yankee stated in May that he's "wrapping the tour at the end of the year in Puerto Rico" (reference 28). Also, regarding that dispute, sources included in the article claim that this is his seventh studio album. Brankestein (talk) 02:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Some of the content in the touring section still needs to be updated, as well as the image has no significance anymore, as a quick google search has told me that the final shows are at José Miguel Agrelot Coliseum. Cherrell410 (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I have updated the Touring section and removed the image. Brankestein (talk) 16:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]