Jump to content

Talk:Lee Peltier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Peltier has been bid for 1.75 million by Leicester, huddersfield said they would not sell him for any less than £2m. He has not been sold yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.98.246 (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lee Peltier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:32, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]
Expanded slightly but there's not a while lot of information available for his caps.

Club career

[edit]
Unfortunately not it would seem, I've searched quite considerably but there doesn't seem to be much to add. Kosack (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • .[10] Two months later, he made his Champions League debut for Liverpool against Galatasaray. He played the full 90 minutes at right-back as Liverpool lost 3–2 - for this to have happened, there must have been a huge shortage of players. Is there anything on why this happened? Playing in the Champions League is a ridiculously huge deal in comparison to some of the other pieces of information. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Liverpool had already confirmed qualification to the next round so the result was largely meaningless. As such, several reserve and youth players were given a run out. Kosack (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is fairly common, usually when a young player's team has pretty much decided that they're not gonna be retained. This allows the youth player a better chance of finding a new team. Kosack (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Huddersfield Town
[edit]
Leeds United
[edit]
  • "After much speculation regarding Peltier's position lf captain" - typo? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]
  • "After much speculation regarding Peltier's position lf captain, despite captaining Leeds during 2013–14 pre-season and for the opening two games of the season, Peltier was replaced in the role by teammate Rodolph Austin who returned to the side against Leicester City on 11 August 2013" this whole sentence needs better flow actually. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]
  • Leeds announced that Peltier had signed for Nottingham Forest on loan, however Forest owner Fawaz Al-Hasawi announced the same day that the deal hadn't been completed,[60] leading to confusion over which club Peltier was contracted to - "leading to" isn't quite right, there was clearly already some confusion. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]
  • Peltier revealed upon his return to Leeds that he wasn't sure what his future would hold - I know this means afterwards, but it's placement is confusing, reads as though he went from being at Forrest back to Leeds, and then back on loan Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]
  • The image captions aren't my favourite. They seem more like altext than captions. Can they not read something like "Peltier playing for Leicester City in 2011, making 40 appearances."? Or similar? They just don't seem very helpful right now - the images don't show a lot. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]

Rest of article prose

[edit]
  • "a hard working defensive type of player who likes to tackle and pass the ball. I get about the pitch quite well and keep it simple." - The "I" in this quote is off, considering we are talking about the player can we use [He gets] about..? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Done[reply]
  • Peltier is close friends with fellow footballer James Vaughan. - Is this in any way notable? Footballers being friends with other footballers seems super unnotable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC) - Removed [reply]

Notes & References

[edit]
  • Sources look reliable
  • Source 33 has a weird name - "Everton 5– Huddersfield". BBC Sport. 25 August 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2019." -Fixed
  • Same does 35 - "MK Dons 1– Huddersfield Town". BBC Sport. 22 April 2011. Retrieved 14 January 2019. -Fixed

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
@Lee Vilenski: I think I've addressed all of the issues above, let me know if there's anything else. Kosack (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]