Talk:Lede, Belgium

Comments

Can someone improve the formatting of this article?--Blingice 22:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved. Consensus to not move the page and move Lede (disambiguation) to the base title in absence of primary topic. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 06:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lede, Belgium → Lede – Was first moved to disambiguate, the primary redirects there now. Unnecessary disambiguation. Other entries at Lede (disambiguation) do not directly share the same name. Lazz _R 00:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazz R and 70.51.201.106: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose speedy move I think the disambiguation page should be primary, or lead paragraph, since "lede" is an alternate name for that. Indeed, "lede" primarily refers to the lead paragraph [1]; Belgium's 'Lede' is not the primary topic. -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The dab page should be at the base term, since there is no clear primary topic. If there was a primary topic then it would be lead paragraph. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose clearly no Primary for lede. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Lede (journalism) is only linked from three pages, and still gets over two-thirds of the views that Lede, Belgium does. The disambiguation page should be primary. Lede paragraph also gets almost as many as Lede (journalism), and doesn't even appear in the DAB page or search dropdown. 62.165.227.102 (talk) 12:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's false that "other entries at Lede (disambiguation) do not directly share the same name", because Lede (journalism) does. But Lede paragraph may be a better term at the disambiguation page, since the topic is not restricted to journalism (and the article title is lead paragraph). 62.165.227.102 (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 70.51.201.106, Xezbeth, In ictu oculi and 62.165.227.102, along with supporting deletion of the main title header's qualifier "(disambiguation)". No WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The current title is perfect. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.