This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
A user has suggested [1] that the article from order-order.com [2] is not a reliable source for a living person's biography page. The user argues that order-order.com is an "anti-establishment" "rightwing" "blog" and therefore is unreliable.
The counter-argument is that:
(1) Being "anti-establishment" or "rightwing" *does not* necessarily make a source "unreliable".
(2) In the case of order-order.com, they hold a 9/9 rating from journalism industry monitor NewsGuard for meeting all 9 of the standards for transparency and credibility: [3]. Clearly, That kind of validation must carry more weight than any individual's non-objective opinion?
(3) The article in question simply links two established and verifiable facts and points out their obvious incompatibility.
Note I did not say that the blog was unreliable merely because it was anti-establishment and right-wing. All sources have slants. The difficulty comes when a source's bias creeps excessively into its content, evident here when you read the source's "about" page which outright declares it has no interest in objective impartiality. I can't read the NewsGuard item, it just redirects me to install the browser extension. I'll post at the reliable sources noticeboard later. – Teratix₵00:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
