Jump to content

Talk:Landscape planning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2020 and 9 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Calabrese.Andrew.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Broads

[edit]

The wording of the article suggests that is was intentional to create a recreational resource following mineral workings in The Broads. In reality, they were thought to be natural features until the 1960s, so I don't believe its fair to suggest this is an example of landscape planning.

unsupported Theory section

[edit]

This much text in the Theory section would need lots of citations, but there are none. Perhaps it should be deleted. Gomm 20:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

It's been there 12 years or more in this totally-uncited, WP:OR, disputed state? It won't be there any longer. Ugh. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landscape planning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]