Talk:Lady Amelia Windsor

This article was nominated for deletion on September 1 2015. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Red: 2018

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

It is requested that a photograph of Lady Amelia Windsor be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Family Weddings

A cousin of the immediate Royal Family is not worthy of relevance as part of their personal life section.

That should be about their immediate family, relationships and any conditions etc.

Regards

Juanpumpchump (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And who determines what is "worthy of relevance"? It is mentioned in the article because it was covered in news articles through multiple media outlets, especially since she was not invited to the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Attending events is part of her personal life, especially royal events in her capacity as both a member of the extended British Royal Family and as a British socialite. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Socialite" or simply hanger-on and all you are adding is niff naff and trivia and therefore not worth mentioning in article.

You have also been warned before on reversions and edit-warring.

Juanpumpchump (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I was engaged in a similar situation, where a person was removing sourced and cited information from the article. That user ended up being blocked indefinitely because their behavior became abusive. I was blocked temporarily because I continued to revert their edits instead of going about the proper means of acquiring help in the situation. Nevertheless, that situation has nothing to do with this article, so there is not a need to bring it up. See other articles on British royalty and nobility, as well as other English socialites. You will see similar style in the personal life sections of the articles. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is relevance and trivia and the items that you keep reverting are not relevant to the personal life section of the article.

Juanpumpchump (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

News outlets reported that she was not invited to the wedding of Henry & Meghan, while she was, as a member of the family, in attendance to the wedding of William & Catherine. There is notability in that it was reported on ([1]), and therefore added to the article. If it does not belong in personal life, then where would you suggest it goes? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the information again, which makes more than 3 revisions. Also, attending a royal function and walking a dog are not the same thing.. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]