This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
A fact from Labour Party of Scotland appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
"Former SNP leader, William Wolfe has stated that this breakaway was more to do with local personal political ambition than over any ideological dispute." - well he would say that, wouldn't he? He's partisan in it. What's the real story here? --MacRusgail (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At various points in the article, sentences switch from referring to the party as an "it" to "they". That needs some form of standardisation (preferably to the former). For instance, we have "they are perhaps best known" rather than "it is perhaps best known", and later there is "they were broadly left-wing ". Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done.
" 'Labour Party of Scotland' " - cut the single quotation marks. I think maybe this could be done in a better way. Perhaps something like "It modeled itself on a separate, Glaswegian group that had been founded in 1971 and which had also called itself the "Labour Party of Scotland"." Do you think that an improvement? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done.
This is not essential for GA, but I wonder if it would be worth putting the years of activity in that very first sentence. Something like "short-lived political party in the United Kingdom that was active between the early 1970s and 1973". That gives the reader an instant appreciation of the time frame that they are dealing with. In turn, we could be rid of the "short-lived" piece, and in its place put "Scottish nationalist"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
