This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2021 and 2022.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
Section sizes
error: LGBT representation in American adult animation is a redirect (help)
@User:Urve, I don't mind removing the entry for Douglas, honestly, as I see what you are saying. Would you say that he shouldn't be mentioned at all? Or could we say the following on this page?:
@Historyday01: Your rewrite is fine, but I don't see the claim supported that the historical figure was homosexual in the sources on his article, or in the one you cite, nor anything I can find myself. This seems to suggest he was anti-gay and didn't identify as gay. Omitting the word "homosexual" from the description of the real figure would be fine with me -- this character does seem to be based on this figure, as he was instrumental to boxing regulations, etc. Though, someone might take issue with that description being WP:OR since it's also not supported by any sources (and I can't find any), but I don't feel strongly. Regarding deletion from the other articles: Whatever is decided should apply across other articles, I agree, since this is (IMO) a sourcing dispute. Urve (talk) 22:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]