Talk:L-11 76.2 mm tank gun

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L-11 76.2 mm tank gun article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Shell (projectile)#Armour-piercing.2C composite rigid|armour-piercing, composite rigid]] The anchor (#Armour-piercing.2C composite rigid) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Inconsistency between stated barrel length in meters and calibres

The L-11 gun is stated to have a barrel length of 3.2m or 30.5 calibres. But, the calibre of the gun is 76.2 mm - thus a barrel length of 3.2m is 3200 / 76.2 = 42 calibres. So, one of the stated values must be incorrect. Either the barrel is 42 calibres long, or it has a length of 2.32m. Is it possible that the digits were transposed from 2.3m to 3.2m? Rv8 (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]