Talk:Korean Canadians

Canada Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Korea Town in Burnaby/Coquitlam

Please can someone create an article about koreatown, because the local paper says it is the largest koreatown in North America.209.121.155.196 (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was a huge debate about this in the Vancouver portal about this. Originally there was an article about Koreatown on Robson Street, but it got canned because the people feel that if it is not officially called such, there shouldn't be an article about such. Personally I disagree because they are there, such as in Coquitlam/Burnaby (personally I hate the name Burquitlam). Anyhow, if someone what's to try to make an article then I will support it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skippingrock (talk • contribs) 03:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Korean Business Association

David Zimmer Statement re Ontario Korean Business Association 11 17 09. Perhaps we need more info about this. Komitsuki (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Subsection Suggestion

Would anyone be opposed to the addition of a section on areas of high concentration of Korean immigrants, such as Toronto and Vancouver and the corresponding communities that have been established there in more depth. This would include a short further exploration of the history of these areas and what and where these communities are now. I would draw upon the Koreatown Toronto article already in existence, and possibly build upon what was already suggested in the talk thread about Koreatown in Vancouver. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treesports (talk • contribs) 21:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Religions in Infobox

The infobox is for summarising sourced, non-contentious information from the article body. Catholicism and Protestantism are both forms of Christianity; there is no reason for listing them separately, especially when there are no sources in the article discussing Korean Canadians' practise of the two denominations or their relative prevalence to each other or to Buddhism & irreligion. Regards, 61.10.165.33 (talk) 00:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 February 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Canadian → Korean Canadians – Should be plural and consistent with other similar titles per WP:CRITERIA. George Ho (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support, good call. Greg Kaye 07:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Easy support per WP:PLURAL Red Slash 00:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korean Canadians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101023213104/http://www.mofat.go.kr/consul/overseascitizen/compatriotcondition/index6.jsp?TabMenu=TabMenu6 to http://www.mofat.go.kr/consul/overseascitizen/compatriotcondition/index6.jsp?TabMenu=TabMenu6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]