This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:22, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Sourcing and references to sources are very important in Wikipedia, and adequate sourcing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the acceptance of a draft. There seems to be a myth among would-be submitters that adding more references is the key to the acceptance of a draft. Adequate sourcing is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the acceptance of a draft. No amount of editing will overcome a lack of notability, and no amount of adding of sources will make a run-of-the-mill item notable. If a draft has already been declined for lack of notability, it may be more useful to provide an explanation, in English, on the draft talk page, of how notability is satisfied. If you have already provided your best three references, and the draft has been declined, it does not need more references. It either needs a better explanation of notability, or the subject is not notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:KylieTastic - You recently declined this draft. My first thought is to accept because the album has charted, but my second thought is that if another reviewer has declined, we should discuss first. Is there a specific reason, or a lack of a reason?
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Robert McClenon I declined because it did not have the sources (just 1 at the time) - I had bookmarked to improve, and then when they updated to re-review, just not got arround to it. So if it looks good now go ahead, It's a good album currently in my cars CD player :) KylieTastic (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:KylieTastic and Robert McClenon, sorry it took me a while to figure out how Talk Page works.
1. I've added more references to show album "has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it"
2. Have also indicated more clearly in the first paragraph of the wiki page that the album has appeared on Japan's national music chart, Oricon.
Steadystate99 (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
