Talk:Kidd-class destroyer

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Name correspondance

There seems to be some confusion on the correspondance between these ships' former names and current names. Can someone verify and/or provide a link to how they are named? I have always assumed Kidd-->Kee Lung, Callaghan-->Su Au, Scott-->Tso Ying, and Chandler-->Ma Kong --Will74205 16:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I received a message from Hydonsingore saying that he had sent e-mail to the ROCN General Headquarter and received a reply that confirmed Kee Lung was formerlly Scott and Kidd will become Tso Ying. Here is the link of the reply http://www.flickr.com/photos/51744539@N00/82378438/ , it is in Chinese though. --Will74205 17:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Refurbished before sale?

I'm looking for information about where these ships were refurbished prior to their sale to Taiwan. Any info is appreciated.

Steve Kress PHD NSWC

"A good Navy is not a provocation to war. It is the surest guaranty of peace." President Theodore Roosevelt, 2 December 1902, second annual message to Congress —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Loblaw (talk • contribs) 20:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reactivation was done in Charleston, South Carolina.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vsebav-completes-reactivation-of-ex-kidd-class-guided-missile-destroyers-57109157.html Bryan TMF (talk) 20:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does "in exploding scenes" in the film Pearl Harbor mean, in English.JohnC (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ASROC launcher on Kidd class DDGs????

Why does all the Kidd class each ship's page always list ASROC launcher is on board? Already corrected all the Taiwanese part, but too tired to fix those US ships pages.....Bryan TMF (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC) Agree - NO ASROC launcher on the class. However they do originally have the ability to launch ASROCs from the MK 26 launcher (known fact) . I doubt the Taiwan purchased any ASROC weapons for these vessels. I do not know about magazine arrangement for a Mk 36 capable of Launching VLA- could ship load out fully with SM missiles instead, or are some storage locations specific and only able to handle ASROC. Wfoj3 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ASROC rockets were sold to the ROC. Simple googling can confirm this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C5E:2180:7D9:3046:CD43:F417:BD16 (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In movie <Pearl harbor>....

Those destroyers featured in Pearl Harbor were not Kidd class destroyers. They were Spruance-class destroyers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.118.205.190 (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/keelungkiddclassdest/
Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is with the "Tentative Iranian Names"?

There appears to be a tentative Iranian name given for each ship, but no explanation of that in the text. 71.175.171.163 (talk) 00:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kidd-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219202357/http://destroyerhistory.org/ to http://destroyerhistory.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]